Effects of normal saline and selenium-enriched hot spring water on experimentally induced rhinosinusitis in rats
This prospective, randomized, and controlled study examined the effects of normal saline and selenium-enriched hot spring water on experimentally induced rhinosinusitis in rats.
The study comprised two control groups (untreated and saline-treated) and three experimental groups of Sprague Dawley rats. The experimental groups received an instillation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) only, LPS+normal saline (LPS/saline), or LPS+selenium-enriched hot spring water (LPS/selenium). Histopathological changes were identified using hematoxylin-eosin staining. Leakage of exudate was identified using fluorescence microscopy. Microvascular permeability was measured using the Evans blue dye technique. Expression of the Muc5ac gene was measured using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
Mucosal edema and expression of the Muc5ac gene were significantly lower in the LPS/saline group than in the LPS group. Microvascular permeability, mucosal edema, and expression of the Muc5ac gene were significantly lower in the LPS/selenium group than in the LPS group. Mucosal edema was similar in the LPS/selenium group and LPS/saline group, but capillary permeability and Muc5ac expression were lower in the LPS/selenium group.
This study shows that normal saline and selenium-enriched hot spring water reduce inflammatory activity and mucus hypersecretion in LPS-induced rhinosinusitis in rats.
Rhinosinusitis has a severe impact on the health-related quality of life in pediatric populations . Although the mainstay of treatment is oral antibiotic therapy, many patients are refractory to even long courses of broad-spectrum therapy. This has led to the exploration of alternative effective treatments, such as functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Although evidence suggests that functional endoscopic sinus surgery is an effective treatment for pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis refractory to antibiotic treatment , some authors have expressed concerns about its possible interference with sinus development and midfacial growth [, ]. For this reason, a more conservative approach is probably advisable before surgery. Among the conservative approaches, nasal saline irrigation is recognized as beneficial in the treatment of children with seasonal allergies, acute sinusitis, or chronic sinusitis [, ]. However, the development of more effective and tolerable formulations of irrigants other than saline is needed because children may be unwilling to use or may be intolerant to irrigation.
In recent years, the role of selenium in preventing human disease has attracted attention because selenium has significant anti-inflammatory effects . However, determining whether this property could translate into the use of selenium in an ideal nasal irrigant is hindered by a lack of data. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of normal saline irrigation and selenium-enriched saline irrigation on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory response in the nasal cavity and sinus of a rat model.
2. Materials and methods
The LPS used in this study was derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (L-4524; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). It was dissolved in normal saline solution at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The source of selenium was a selenium-enriched solution from Gumjin hot spring water, which contains a rich supply of the minerals selenium, vanadium, calcium and magnesium. The chemical analysis of the hot spring water is reported in Table 1. Thirty-one healthy Sprague Dawley rats, weighing 200–250 g and free of pathogens and respiratory diseases according to the health and pathology reports of the supplier, were used. All animals were housed and treated according to the regulations of the Catholic Ethics Committee of the Catholic University of Korea, which conformed to the NIH guidelines for the use of animals in research.
|Parameter||Results (range)||Units of measurement|
|Chloride ion (Cl–)||16,000–19,500||mg/L|
|Sulfuric acid (SO42–)||3000–4500||mg/L|
Analyses were carried out by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology, the Korea Basic Science Institute and the Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources.
All experiments were performed with the rats subjected to 2% xylazine (8 mg/kg) anesthesia. Inhalant anesthesia was avoided to prevent irritation of the nasal mucosa. Both airways of the nasal cavity received an instillation of 0.1 mL of saline containing 0.1 mg LPS once per day for 3 days. The instillate was deposited as a bead of fluid on the external nares and the rats were allowed to aspirate it. Some rats were instilled with saline as a control. We carefully monitored breathing rate and skin color during instillation to prevent respiratory failure.
Thirty-one rats were allocated randomly to three treatment groups of seven animals each with 10 animals allocated to the control groups. One control group of three rats received no LPS or saline instillation (normal group), and the other control group of seven rats was instilled with 0.1 mL of normal saline once per day for 3 days (saline group). All experimental groups received an instillation of LPS (0.1 mL) once per day for 3 days. The LPS group received an LPS instillation alone, the LPS/selenium group additionally received an instillation of 0.1 mL of a selenium-enriched saline solution, and the LPS/saline group additionally received an instillation of 0.1 mL of normal saline. Evans blue dye (E2129-10G; Sigma–Aldrich) was injected into the femoral vein at 20 mg/mL per kilogram of body weight 30–60 min before death. The rats turned blue immediately after infusion of the dye, confirming its uptake and distribution throughout the body. The rats were exsanguinated 30 min after injection of dye and residual blood cells were flushed from the vascular system by perfusion of 100 mL of normal saline solution through an intra-aortic catheter. The nasal cavity was then lavaged with 0.1 mL of formamide for 5 min to collect the extravasated Evans blue dye. After collecting the extravasated Evans blue dye, the head was removed and cleaned of skin and fur. A coronal incision was then made 1 mm posterior to the eyes to extract the maxilla (including the sinonasal cavity) for tissue processing. Half of the harvested bone was used for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and half was used for staining. For staining, the bone was fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, decalcified in a rapid decalcifying solution (CalciClear Rapid; National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA), embedded in a paraffin block, and cut into 4–5 μm thick sections perpendicular to the plane of the hard palate. The mucosa of the maxillary sinus and nasal cavity was stained with hematoxylin and eosin to determine histopathological changes.
The degree and location of the Evans blue dye extravasations in the nasal cavity and sinus mucosa were examined on unstained slides using confocal scanning microscopy (543 nm, Bio-Rad Radiance Plus; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). To quantify the amount of extravasated dye, absorbance of the supernatant at 630 nm was measured using a model Du-530 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). The thickness of the mucosa was defined as the maximum thickness of the mucosa overlying the nasal septum and was measured at a magnification of ×400. The mean mucosal thickness was calculated using three sections per group. The other half of the harvested bone was homogenized, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −70 °C. RNA was then extracted using an extraction kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Polymerase activation for Muc5ac was performed at 95 °C for 15 min followed by 32 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. Polymerase activation for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was performed at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. The primer sequences were obtained from GenBank and were designed using Gene Runner software (Hastings Software, Las Vegas, NV). The sequences of the primers were as follows: Muc5ac: forward, 5′-CATAGCCTCCTCTTGTTC-3′ and reverse, 3′-ATTCCTGTAGCAGTAGTGAG-5′; and GAPDH, forward, 5′-GCTGGTGCTGAGTATGTCGT-3′ and reverse, 3′-GAATGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAA-5′. GAPDH was used as a constitutive control. The products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized using ethidium bromide staining. The bands were digitized using a Universal Hood system (Bio-Rad). The mean Muc5ac-to-GAPDH band photodensity ratio was calculated for each group.
Group means were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results are presented as the mean score ± standard. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
3.1. Changes in the microvascular permeability of the mucosa of the nasal cavity and sinus
Results are shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2. In the control groups (untreated and saline-treated), little Evans blue was extravasated into the mucosa and the mean absorbance levels were 0.07 ± 0.03 and 0.10 ± 0.04, respectively. In the LPS group, a significant amount of dye was observed in the mucosa, which was observed as intense red under 543 nm wavelength of fluorescence microscope. Its absorbance was 0.20 ± 0.01, significantly higher than those of control groups (P = 0.001). In the LPS/saline group, a similar amount of dye was observed in the mucosa, with an absorbance of 0.17 ± 0.03. The difference absorbance values for the LPS/saline and LPS groups were not significant (P = 0.08). In the LPS/selenium group, a small amount of dye was observed in the mucosa, and the absorbance was 0.15 ± 0.01, which was significantly lower than the LPS and LPS/saline group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively).
3.2. Thickness of the septal mucosa
Comparisons of the mucosal thickness are shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 4. The mucosal thickness was significantly increased in the LPS group (1.98 ± 0.90 mm) than in the untreated group (0.61 ± 0.20 mm; P = 0.001) and the saline treated group (0.69 ± 0.13 mm; P = 0.001). Compared with the value of LPS group, the mucosal thickness of the LPS/saline group (0.11 ± 0.27 mm) and the LPS/selenium group (0.93 ± 0.22 mm) was significantly lower (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no differences between the LPS/saline and LPS/selenium groups (P = 0.22).
3.3. Muc5ac expression in the nasal cavity and sinus
Compared with the saline control group, LPS induced a 3.6-fold increase in mucin gene expression (Fig. 5). Upregulation of Muc5ac mRNA expression was significantly inhibited in the LPS/saline and LPS/selenium groups (P = 0.01, P = 0.01). The level of Muc5ac mRNA expression in the LPS/saline group was significantly higher than in the LPS/selenium group (P = 0.01).
Nasal saline irrigation is a personal hygiene practice that flushes mucus and debris from the nasal cavity. Nasal saline irrigation has long been a mainstay of treatment for sinonasal disease in the adult population because of its economy, safety, and apparent efficacy.
A recent Cochrane review provides evidence that nasal saline irrigation is beneficial when used as a treatment adjunct and when used as the sole modality of treatment . This review also provides evidence that routine use of nasal saline irrigation is associated with decreased use of antibiotics. In 1998, Shoseyov et al. performed a randomized double-blind study to compare the efficacy of hypertonic saline irrigation to normal saline irrigation in 34 children with chronic sinusitis . Both hypertonic and normal saline irrigation improved nasal secretions/postnasal drip. In 2009, Wang et al. performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare normal saline irrigation with no irrigation in 69 children with acute sinusitis . Children in the study group had significantly improved nasal peak expiratory flow and mean quality of life scores, and decreased nasal symptoms compared with the control group. More recently, in 2011, Wei et al. performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare daily normal saline irrigation with saline/gentamicin irrigation in 34 children with chronic rhinosinusitis. Once-daily intranasal irrigation with 45 mL to each nostril for 6 weeks was safe and effective, and significantly improved the quality of life after 3 weeks of irrigation . We aimed to identify the changes in the inflammatory response and mucus secretion using the experimentally LPS-induced rhinosinusitis rat model instead of a survey of the changes or improvements in subjective symptoms in patients recorded in most previous studies .
The respiratory tract epithelium of mammals is protected by mucus, a viscoelastic gel normally produced at low levels. Overproduction of mucus occurs in cases of airway disease, such as rhinitis, sinusitis, and chronic bronchitis. This overproduction of mucus causes airway obstruction and contributes to morbidity. The major macromolecular components of mucus are mucin glycoproteins (mucins), and these large, highly glycosylated macromolecules have protein backbones encoded by Muc genes (Mucs1–4, Muc5ac, Muc5b, and Mucs6–13 and 15–18). Of these, Muc5ac is generally recognized to be the major gene encoding airway mucins because it is highly expressed in the goblet cells of the airway epithelium [, , ]. Therefore, in this study, Muc5ac was analyzed to evaluate mucus hypersecretion as a marker of the severity of rhinosinusitis.
Although intranasal instillation of saline did not significantly attenuate the increase in LPS-induced microvascular permeability, saline instillation attenuated LPS-induced mucosal thickness and overexpression of Muc5ac in the sinonasal tract. These results show that saline irrigation suppresses both edema and mucus hypersecretion by downregulating Muc5ac mRNA expression.
Although nasal saline irrigation is beneficial in the treatment of children with sinonasal disease, perhaps the biggest barrier to routine recommendation of nasal saline irrigation in children is the perception that children may be unwilling to try irrigation and may be unable to tolerate irrigation. Effective and more tolerable irrigants than normal saline are needed, especially in pediatric patients. We are interested in whether selenium-enriched solutions have therapeutic value as an anti-inflammatory agent in treating rhinosinusitis. These solutions have no smell and are slightly more salty than normal saline.
Although the data come almost exclusively from in vitro studies, there are strong indications that viral, bacterial, or stress-induced inflammation may be influenced by selenium availability. Decreased serum selenium levels have been observed in acute and chronic inflammatory states associated with high C-reactive protein levels . Low selenium levels have also been noted in severe inflammatory response syndrome, which is marked by increased production of reactive oxygen species by activated macrophages, induction of oxidative damage, and tissue injury . In a small observational study, selenium supplementation reduced oxidative damage and improved clinical outcomes . In a randomized, multicenter study, selenium administration reduced mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock . All of these studies reported a beneficial effect of selenium supplementation on multiple organ function and outcome together with a clear tendency of improvement in mortality rates.
In our current study, intranasal instillation of selenium-enriched saline attenuated the LPS-induced increase in microvascular permeability and reduced the LPS-induced increase in mucosal thickness. Selenium-enriched saline also attenuated the LPS-induced mRNA overexpression of Muc5ac. Thus, intranasal instillation of selenium-enriched saline significantly reduced LPS-induced inflammation of the sinonasal tract in this rat model. These results suggest that selenium-enriched saline suppresses both inflammation and mucus hypersecretion by downregulating Muc5ac mRNA expression. Although the mucosal thickness was not significantly less in the LPS/selenium group compared with the LPS/saline group, the LPS-induced increases in microvascular permeability and expression of Muc5ac were significantly smaller in the LPS/selenium group than in the LPS/saline group. These results show that selenium is more effective in treating LPS-induced rhinosinusitis than is normal saline solution.
Although the reason why the LPS/selenium group showed better response than the LPS/saline group is not known, the following scenario is conceivable. Selenium-enriched saline decreases both inflammation and proinflammatory properties that produce mucus and cause hypersecretion . A recent study showed that selenium supplementation significantly decreases the LPS-induced expression of the main proinflammatory genes tumor necrosis factor-α and cyclooxygenase-2 by inhibiting the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway . Another study reported that selenium supplementation attenuates nuclear factor-κB-dependent proinflammatory gene expression via the synthesis of 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin 2 in LPS-treated macrophage . In addition, various minerals, such as Ca, K, Br, Zn, and especially Mg salts, have favorable effects in the treatment of inflammatory diseases .
Further studies on the long-term clinical effects and compliance of selenium-enriched hot spring water on pediatric rhinosinusitis are needed. If proven to have beneficial effects, we believe selenium-enriched hot spring water will become valuable in clinical practice.
Intranasal administration of normal saline and selenium-enriched hot spring water reduced inflammatory activities, such as elevated microvascular permeability, tissue edema, and expression of the Muc5ac gene, in LPS-induced rhinosinusitis in rats. These results demonstrate that normal saline irrigation plays a role in reducing inflammatory activity and mucus hypersecretion, and suggest that selenium-enriched hot spring water might be useful clinically as a nasal irrigation solution to reduce inflammatory activity and mucus hypersecretion in pediatric sinonasal disease.
This study was supported by grants from Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Institute for Advancement of Technology, and Gangwon Leading Industry Office, Korea.